Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study

Citation
L. Abramowitz et al., Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study, DIS COL REC, 43(5), 2000, pp. 590-596
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN journal
00123706 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
590 - 596
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(200005)43:5<590:ASDTCO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Anal incontinence affects approximately 10 percent of adult females. Damage to the anal sphincters has been considered as the cause of anal incontinen ce after childbirth in the sole prospective study so far available. The aim s of the present study were to determine prospectively the incidence of ana l incontinence and anal sphincter damage after childbirth and their relatio nship with obstetric parameters. METHODS: We studied 259 consecutive female s six weeks before and eight a weeks after delivery. They were asked to fil l in a questionnaire assessing fecal incontinence. Anal endosonography (7-1 0 MHz) was then performed. Two independent observers analyzed internal and external anal sphincters. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients (90 percent) wer e assessed, of whom 31 had cesarean section. De novo sphincter defects were observed in 16.7 percent (14 percent external, 1.7 percent internal, and 1 percent both) in the postpartum period only after vaginal delivery. These disruptions occurred with the same incidence after the first and the second childbirth. independent risk factors (odds ratio, 95 percent confidence in terval) for sphincter defect were forceps (12; 4-20), perineal tears (16; 9 -25), episiotomy (G.G; 5-17), and parity (8.8; 4-19) as revealed by multiva riate analyses. The overall rate of anal incontinence was 9 percent and ind ependent risk factors (odds ratio: 95 percent confidence interval) involved forceps (4.5; 1.5-13), perineal tears (3.9; 1.4-10.3), sphincter defect (5 .5; 5-15), and prolonged labor (3.4; 1-11). Among these patients only 45 pe rcent had sphincter defects. CONCLUSION: Anal incontinence after delivery i s multifactorial, and anal sphincter defects account for only 45 percent of them. Primiparous and secundiparous patients have the same risk factors fo r sphincter disruption and anal incontinence. Because external anal sphinct er disruptions are more frequent than internal anal sphincter damage, surgi cal repair should be discussed in symptomatic patients.