M. Pinna-pintor et al., Severe steroid-unresponsive ulcerative colitis - Outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy in patients undergoing cyclosporin treatment, DIS COL REC, 43(5), 2000, pp. 609-613
PURPOSE: The recent introduction of the immune suppressor cyclosporin for t
reatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis has required surgeons to
perform a colectomy in those patients who eventually fail this rescue treat
ment, thus raising questions as to the safety of surgery as per formed in p
atients with a heavily manipulated immune system. To assess the rates of mo
rtality and morbidity in this setting, we studied a cohort of consecutive p
atients who had surgery after failing cyclosporin for refractory ulcerative
colitis at sur center. METHODS: Between January 1991 and December 1996, 25
patients with ulcerative colitis underwent restorative proctocolectomy per
formed in three steps (21 patients) and in two steps (4 patients). Seventee
n of the 25 patients (68 percent) mere initial nonresponders to a dose of 2
mg/kg/day of intravenous cyclosporin and underwent surgery immediately, th
e remaining 8 (32 percent) relapsed as outpatients on oral cyclosporin and
were readmitted for surgery. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Nin
e patients of the 25 developed postoperative (early) complications (36 perc
ent). The three-step operation subset had a 28 percent complication rate, t
he two-step 75 percent. Three patients needed reoperation. A total of 11 pa
tients (44 percent) reported with late complications: two patients required
surgical treatment, one for obstruction and one for pouch-perianal fistula
. Three cases of pouchitis were recorded. No patient required pouch removal
. CONCLUSION: Given the absence of postoperative mortality and a low overal
l complication rate, restorative proctocolectomy can safely be performed in
patients who fail rescue treatment with a dose of 2 mg/kg of cyclosporin f
or steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Corollary evidence in this articl
e hints but does not prove that the three-step procedure is safer than the
two-step operation.