Ec. Poulin et al., Should enteric fistulas from Crohn's disease or diverticulitis be treated laparoscopically or by open surgery? A matched cohort study, DIS COL REC, 43(5), 2000, pp. 621-626
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study a group of consecutive patients
with enteric fistulas treated by laparoscopic surgery and to compare outco
mes with a matched group of patients treated by open surgery. METHODS: The
outcomes of 13 patients with Crohn's disease or sigmoid diverticulitis with
enteric fistulas treated laparoscopically (Group I) were compared with 13
patients matched for age, weight, gender, diagnosis, and characteristics of
fistulas and treated by conventional surgery (Group II) during the same pe
riod. RESULTS: No patient died postoperatively in either group. Mean operat
ive time was 183 minutes in Group I vs. 154 minutes in Group II (P = 0.280)
. No significant difference was found between Groups I and II in the number
of patients with major postoperative complications (3 vs. 5; P = 0.462), o
r postoperative stay (7.6 +/- 3.6 vs. 9.2 +/- 3 days; P = 0.239). Conversio
n to open laparotomy occurred in one (7.7 percent) patient from Group I. No
patient required readmission for secondary surgery in Group I, and two pat
ients were readmitted and underwent reoperation for complications in Group
II (P = 0.462). CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic treatment of selected cases o
f enteric fistulas is safe. Although most good outcome trends favor the lap
aroscopic group, the study is inconclusive, because no statistical differen
ce was demonstrated with regard to operative time, number of postoperative
complications, readmission rate, and length of postoperative stay, most lik
ely because of the small number of cases in each arm of the study. Study of
a greater number of cases outside the learning curve of the laparoscopic s
urgeons would clarify this issue. Other outcomes, including cost, pain cont
rol, cosmesis, and return to activities of daily living, need to be include
d in the evaluation.