PURPOSE: The study was undertaken to determine whether idiopathic fecal inc
ontinence in middle-aged and elderly females is likely to be a result of pu
dendal nerve damage (neurogenic incontinence) or merely a consequence of ag
ing. METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight females over the age of 50 years wi
th fecal incontinence were studied. The incontinence was classified as idio
pathic because none of the patients related the incontinence to trauma (inc
luding obstetric trauma) or other events or diseases. AU had an anal physio
logy examination, including determination of nerve conduction velocity of b
oth pudendal nerves (pudendal nerve terminal motor latency). RESULTS: With
a cutoff value of 2.4 msec, 79 percent (95 percent confidence limit, 73-85)
had normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency on both sides, 13 bilater
ally prolonged latency (7 percent; 4-11), and 25 unilaterally prolonged lat
ency (14 percent; 9-19). With a cutoff value of 2.2 msec, Gb percent (59-73
) had normal latency on both sides, 15 percent (9-20) bilaterally prolonged
pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and 20 percent (14-26) unilateral p
rolongation. No relationship between the groups with normal, bilateral, or
unilateral prolongation of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and anal r
esting and squeeze pressure was found. Anal resting pressure decreased with
increasing age (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data support the view that idio
pathic fecal incontinence in the majority of females is likely to be a resu
lt of the aging process and that only a limited number may suffer from anal
incontinence of neurogenic origin. Furthermore, unilateral prolongation of
pudendal nerve terminal motor latency probably is without clinical signifi
cance.