The clinical and economic burden of osteoporosis is high and has resulted i
n increasing interest in assessing the costs and benefits associated with s
trategies to reduce the incidence of fracture. In this article, we aim to s
ummarize the major issues related to conducting economic evaluations of the
rapies for osteoporosis. We identify the principal data parameters (baselin
e clinical probabilities, effectiveness, costs, and utilities) and economic
model characteristics (patient age, compliance, and duration of therapy).
We highlight these issues by referring to previous studies identified in a
systematic review and to current work in the area. Further discussion provi
des an overview of the results of the existing economic evaluations of ther
apies for osteoporosis and a brief summary of ongoing research in Canada. I
n conclusion, there appears to be a consensus in the literature that under
most circumstances hormone replacement therapy is cost-effective in the tre
atment of osteoporosis. Further research is required before definitive conc
lusions on the cost-effectiveness of other therapies can be made. Drug Dev.
Res. 49:135-140, 2000. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.