E. Kaminski et C. Jaupart, Lithosphere structure beneath the Phanerozoic intracratonic basins of North America, EARTH PLAN, 178(1-2), 2000, pp. 139-149
Four intracratonic basins of North America, the Hudson Bay, Michigan, Illin
ois and Williston basins, have similar ages and are close to one another. Y
et, they exhibit different subsidence histories characterised by different
time-scales and sediment thicknesses. They can be explained by local lithos
phere thinning and by the cooling of the induced thermal anomaly. Within th
e framework of 1D thermal models for vertical heat transport, each basin re
quires a different lithosphere thickness or a different boundary condition
at the base of the lithosphere. Heat flow and seismic studies show that, be
neath the North American craton, the lithosphere is too thick for the assum
ption of purely vertical heat transfer to be valid. Thermal models are deve
loped to account for finite thermal anomaly width and for two types of basa
l boundary conditions, fixed temperature or fixed heat flux. Different subs
idence histories are explained by deep lithospheric anomalies of different
sizes. The stability of thick continental roots requires the mantle part of
the lithosphere to be compositionally buoyant with respect to 'normal' con
vecting mantle. Localised lithospheric thinning, due for example to plume p
enetration, results in the emplacement of compositionally denser mantle int
o the lithosphere. This represents a load which drives permanent flexure. T
he cooling time and the characteristics of flexure allow constraints on the
dimensions of these deep lithospheric anomalies. There are no solutions fo
r lithosphere thicknesses less than 170 km. The Williston and Illinois basi
ns are associated with wide (similar to 200 km) and thin anomalies (similar
to 100 km), whereas the Michigan and Hudson Bay are located on top of narr
ow (similar to 100 km) and tall (similar to 200 km) anomalies. (C) 2000 Els
evier Science B.V. All rights reserved.