ParaSight-F dipstick antigen test in the diagnosis of Falciparum malaria in Ethiopia

Citation
T. Mengesha et al., ParaSight-F dipstick antigen test in the diagnosis of Falciparum malaria in Ethiopia, E AFR MED J, 76(11), 1999, pp. 626-629
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0012835X → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
626 - 629
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-835X(199911)76:11<626:PDATIT>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: To determine the shelf life, rapidity and diagnostic performance of ParaSight-F, Design: Prospective randomised study. Settings: Malaria diagnostic and treatment posts and health centres in cent ral-southern part of the Ethiopian Rift Valley. Subjects: Three hundred and eighty two subjects randomly selected. Main outcome measures: Double blind evaluation of the sensitivity, specific ity and predictive values of PFT versus CBF, Results: The point prevalence was found to be 29.7% with species dominance of P.falciparum to P. vivax in the ratio of 4:1, The ParaSight-F test showe d, considering P, falciparum only, a sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity o f 93%, A remarkably high positive predictive value (PPV) of 82% as well as a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99% was obtained. Considering all spec ies of Plasmodium, sensitivity was 78.6% and specificity 93%,with PPV and N PV of 82% and 91% respectively. Moreover, PFT was found to be rapid with a batch of ten-strips-a rack completed in 30 to 50 minutes, which was five to six times faster than CBF reading. In shelf-life studies, after one year o f storage at room temperature, results were found similar to the original r eadings, indicating the stability and long durability of the test strips. Conclusion: In their durability and high diagnostic performances, both the microscopic slide readings and PFT were found comparable and interchangeabl e, and advantage in endemic areas where laboratory facilities are not avail able. The rapidity of PFT may be of greater value during malaria epidemics. But during non-epidemic seasons, the inability of PFT not to detect all fo rms of malaria remains a draw back.