Facing economic liberalization and industrial restructuring since the mid-1
980s, Taiwan's labour has been advocating the idea of industrial democracy.
The German co-determination system has been admired as a model to emulate
by some of Taiwan's labour activists. Although the demand for workplace dem
ocracy in Taiwan seems to be promising given recent economic pressures and
political democratization, the future realization of this notion remains in
doubt due to the lack of complementary institutional environments in which
the German co-determination system is embedded. This article identifies se
ven key institutional factors affecting the making of industrial democracy,
which consist of cultural values and ideologies, labour power, strategies
of capital, the role of the state, the legal system, participatory structur
es and labour education. Using a historical comparative approach, this arti
cle compares the differences in these institutional factors and explains th
e relative effectiveness of the realization of industrial democracy between
these two societies.