Study of local environmental knowledge has led to a general critique of sta
te epistemology, positing a controlling, official knowledge that crushes co
mpeting accounts of nature. Skeptical of that claim, in this paper I assess
the differences between state and local knowledge empirically, using a cas
e study of the Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary in Rajasthan, India, to explo
re the way knowledge varies across class, caste, gender, and affiliation wi
thin the state forest bureaucracy. The results show that state versus local
knowing is not the most meaningful division in epistemology, and that it i
s the daily struggle over resources in local political economy that gives r
ise to contending accounts of nature and environmental change. The conclusi
ons further point to knowledge alliances between state and local actors tha
t render certain claims powerful and so determine natural resource manageme
nt policy and direct landscape change.