Sl. Holloway et al., Institutionalising technologies: masculinities, femininities, and the heterosexual economy of the IT classroom, ENVIR PL-A, 32(4), 2000, pp. 617-633
Geographers' renewed interest in institutions reflects traditional concerns
with the way institutions can shape geographies and a more recent interest
in the ways geographies are important in shaping institutions. In this pap
er the authors build on this second strand of work and are specifically con
cerned with children's use of new information and communications technologi
es in schools. The authors suggest that multilayered institutional cultures
, which are shaped by official school policy, teacher practice, and pupil c
ulture, are exceedingly important in shaping distinct cultures of computing
in (and within) the case-study schools. The highly gendered character of t
hese institutional cultures is reflected in the very different attitudes of
male and female pupils to computers and in the patterns of use which gener
ally favour boys rather than girls. These are negotiated through competing
masculinities and femininities in the classroom context, gender identities
which are played out through normative understandings of heterosexuality. T
he authors conclude that we may indeed characterise institutions as 'precar
ious geographical achievements: as suggested by Parr and Philo. Schools are
embedded within wider places, are important sites for the negotiation of g
ender and sexual identities, and, as spaces, are in part shaped through our
notions of gender and sexuality. This achievement is only precarious as in
stitutions are not forever solidified in their current form but are open to
change, both inadvertently and through the concerted actions of individual
s.