Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice - Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospective trial - the OESIL 2 Study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio)

Citation
F. Ammirati et al., Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice - Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospective trial - the OESIL 2 Study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio), EUR HEART J, 21(11), 2000, pp. 935-940
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0195668X → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
935 - 940
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-668X(200006)21:11<935:DSICP->2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background In some patients with syncope health care is inappropriate and i neffective. In a recent observational investigation in community hospitals of the Lazio region of Italy (the OESIL study) 54.4% of patients admitted w ith syncope from the emergency room were discharged without a conclusive di agnosis. Aim of the Study A simplified two-step diagnostic algorithm was developed a nd prospectively implemented in nine community hospitals of the Lazio regio n of Italy in order to improve the diagnostic performance of clinicians, th ereby reducing the number of undiagnosed patients. Study Population The study population included 195 consecutive patients (85 males and 110 females, mean age 62.5 years, range 13-95 years) presenting with a syncopal spell at the emergency room of one of the nine participatin g hospitals in a 2-month period. Results The systematic implementation of the proposed diagnostic algorithm resulted in a striking reduction of undiagnosed cases. The percentage of pa tients discharged without a conclusive diagnosis decreased from 54.4% to 17 .5%. Neurally mediated syncope was diagnosed in 35.2% of cases, cardiac syn cope in 20.9% and neurological syncope in 13.8%. Conclusions The use of specific, simplified diagnostic guidelines and algor ithms results in an improvement of overall clinical performance. However, t he development of such decision-making aids should carefully consider the l ocal circumstances of daily clinical practice. (Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 935-9 40) (C) 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.