Vertical diplopia following local anaesthetic cataract surgery: predominantly a left eye problem?

Citation
Ia. Pearce et al., Vertical diplopia following local anaesthetic cataract surgery: predominantly a left eye problem?, EYE, 14, 2000, pp. 180-184
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
EYE
ISSN journal
0950222X → ACNP
Volume
14
Year of publication
2000
Part
2
Pages
180 - 184
Database
ISI
SICI code
0950-222X(200004)14:<180:VDFLAC>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Purpose Vertical diplopia is an uncommon but disappointing complication of otherwise successful local anaesthetic cataract surgery. We studied strabis mus patterns in a group of such patients to identify the nature and extent of extraocular muscle involvement. Methods A retrospective review identified 15 cases of vertical diplopia fol lowing local anaesthetic cataract surgery between July 1994 and January 199 8. Peribulbar anaesthesia was used in all cases and given by right-handed p rofessionals. Results All cases had otherwise successful cataract surgery (mean age 80.5 years; median pre-operative VA 6/18; median post-operative VA 6/9). The mea n level of vertical diplopia was 7.2 prism dioptres (PD) in the primary pos ition (range 2-25 PD). The left inferior rectus (IR) was paretic in 6 cases and restricted in 5 cases. The left superior rectus (SR) was not affected in any of the cases. The right IR was restricted in a single case. The righ t SR was paretic in 2 cases and restricted in a single case. None of the ca ses had clinical involvement of the oblique muscles. Eleven of the cases we re managed successfully with prisms. Two of the cases required strabismus s urgery. Conclusions The incidence of left eye extraocular muscle involvement was gr eater than right eye involvement, although this did not reach statistical s ignificance (73% vs 27%; p = 0.075). This may be due to the more difficult access of right-handed individuals giving left eye peribulbar injections wi th the needle tract being directed more closely to the muscle cone. The IR muscle is more commonly affected than the SR (80% vs 20%; p = 0.019). An eq ual incidence of paretic and restricted rectus muscle pathology was found i n this study (53% vs 47%; p = 0.818). The exact aetiology of muscle injury is unknown but could be due to direct muscle or nerve trauma, anaesthetic t oxicity, periocular haemorrhage or a combination of these.