A. Vianello et al., Non-invasive ventilatory approach to treatment of acute respiratory failure in neuromuscular disorders. A comparison with endotracheal intubation, INTEN CAR M, 26(4), 2000, pp. 384-390
Objective: Prospectively to investigate the efficacy of non-invasive positi
ve pressure ventilation (NPPV) combined with cricothyroid "mini-tracheostom
y'' (CM) as a first-line intervention in patients with acute respiratory fa
ilure (ARF) of neuromuscular origin, in comparison with positive pressure v
entilation (PPV) via endotracheal intubation (ETI).
Design: Prospective analysis of the short-term outcomes of 14 non-consecuti
ve patients suffering from ARF of neuromuscular origin who were administere
d NPPV and comparison with the outcomes of 14 matched historical control pa
tients receiving conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) via ETI.
Setting: Adult five-bedded respiratory intensive care unit in a university
hospital.
Patients and interventions: Fourteen neuromyopathic patients who developed
hypercapnic ARF and were submitted to NPPV (group A) and fourteen matched h
istorical control patients, who were administered PPV via ETI (group B). Se
ven subjects receiving NPPV also underwent CM. Outcome measures: Mortality
during ICU stay and treatment failure were evaluated; treatment failure was
defined as death or the need for ETI for the NPPV group and as death or th
e inability to wean from MV for the control group. Length of stay in the IC
U and time to improvement, defined as the time required for a significant r
elief of dyspnea and neurologic impairment and for correction of arterial b
lood gases, were also compared.
Results: Intra-hospital mortality and treatment failure were lower in the N
PPV group than in the conventional PPV via ETI group (2 vs 8 cases and 4 vs
11 cases, respectively). In addition, the duration of ICU stay for subject
s who underwent NPPV was shorter than for patients who were intubated (13.6
+/- 9.7 vs 47.1 +/- 51.9 days). "Mini-tracheostomy" was well tolerated and
no significant side effects were encountered. Two patient were excluded fr
om the study because they showed a severe inability to swallow and needed t
o be intubated to protect the upper airway from the risk of aspiration.
Conclusions: Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in combination with
CM may be considered as a safer and more effective alternative to ETI in t
he treatment of patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMD) who develop ARF
and require MV; nevertheless, patient selection remains important, since a
significant proportion of neuromyopathic patients might have to be exclude
d from NPPV because of severe risk of aspiration.