G. Lloyd et al., Are women discriminated against for lipid lowering therapy? Results from aprospective cohort of women with coronary artery disease, INT J CL PR, 54(4), 2000, pp. 217-219
The objective of the study was to compare the lipid management of men and w
omen with documented coronary artery disease in 587 patients (433 men and 1
54 women) undergoing coronary angiography between 1991 and 1995. A fasting
total cholesterol (TC) was measured in all patients on the morning of angio
graphy. A postal/telephone follow-up was carried out one year after angiogr
aphy in a subpopulation of 278 patients (194 men and 84 women) who were not
taking lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) or whose TC was >5.2 mmol/l at the tim
e of angiography. At baseline, mean TC was 5.89 mmol/l (SE 0.06) in the men
and 6.47 mmol/l (SE 0.09) in the women (p=<0.0001). Action or recommendati
on to institute LLT was taken in 141 (32.7%) men and 62 (40.3%) women (p=0.
09). In the follow-up population, comparing men with women, 74 (38.3%) vs 3
9 (46.4%) were taking LLT (p=0.21); 56 (28.9%) vs 26 (31.0%) had not underg
one repeat TC testing (p=0.73); when performed, repeat TC was 5.75 (0.09) m
mol/l vs 5.64 (0.16) mmol/l (p=0.53); mean decrease in TC between baseline
and follow-up was 0.86 (0.10) mmol/l vs 1.01 (0.21) mmol/l (p=0.51). There
was no significant gender difference in lipid management either at the time
of coronary angiography or subsequent follow-up, although the level of lip
id-lowering drug use remained inadequate in both sexes.