Research examining the effect of incremental exercise on cognitive performa
nce has claimed that increases in exercise intensity result in increases in
arousal. An inverted-U effect of incremental exercise on cognitive functio
n has been hypothesized. The majority of researchers have drawn upon unidim
ensional theories of arousal as the underlying rationale for the hypotheses
. Some more recent papers, however, indicate that multidimensional, allocat
able resource theories are better able to explain the effect of incremental
exercise on cognitive performance. This paper examines the extent to which
empirical research supports these theoretical underpinnings. It is conclud
ed that incremental exercise has generally shown no significant effect on a
ccuracy of cognitive performance. Cognitive effort can allocate resources t
o task relevant information, even during maximal exercise. Increases in spe
ed of cognition, from rest, are thought to occur when individuals reach the
ir plasma adrenaline threshold. Results, comparing speed of cognition at re
st with those during heavy exercise, suggest that speed of performance on c
omplex tasks is facilitated by increases in allocatable resources, while si
mple tasks are unaffected.