Alkyldibenzothiophenes hydrodesulfurization-promoter effect, reactivity, and reaction mechanism

Citation
F. Bataille et al., Alkyldibenzothiophenes hydrodesulfurization-promoter effect, reactivity, and reaction mechanism, J CATALYSIS, 191(2), 2000, pp. 409-422
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics","Chemical Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
ISSN journal
00219517 → ACNP
Volume
191
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
409 - 422
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9517(20000425)191:2<409:AHERA>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The promoter effect of Co or Ni on the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) activity of Mo/alumina was studied by using dibenzothiophene (DBT) and 4,6-dimethyld ibenzothiophene (46DMDBT) as reactants. The reaction was carried out at 340 degrees C under a 4 MPa total pressure in a fixed-bed microreactor. On the Mo/alumina catalyst, both reactants had similar reactivities, 46DMDBT bein g even slightly more reactive than DBT. However, as generally observed, on the CoMo/alumina and NiMo/alumina catalysts, DBT was much more reactive (5 to 6 times) than 46DMDBT. This was mainly because of a tremendous enhanceme nt of the rate of the so-called "direct desulfurization" (DDS) pathway of t he HDS of DST, whereas for 46DMDBT this effect was much more limited. It wa s therefore concluded that the main effect of the promoter on the HDS of DB T-type molecules was to increase the rate of the C-S bond cleavage provided this reaction was not hindered by steric constraints. This effect was attr ibuted to an enhancement by the promoter of the basicity of certain sulfur anions in its vicinity. It was also shown that the lower reactivity of 46DM DBT compared to that of DBT measured on the promoted catalysts could not be attributed to differences in the adsorption strength of the reactants, Ass uming that CS bond cleavage occurred through a B-elimination process, sever al other explanations for the low reactivity of 46DMDBT were proposed and d iscussed: (a) steric hindrance of the adsorption of the dihydrointermediate s by the methyl groups; (b) steric hindrance by the methyl groups of the C- S bond cleavage; (c) the fact that only one H atom is available for the C-S bond cleavage; (d) an effect of the methyl group on the acidity of the H a tom involved in the elimination step. Proposals were also made concerning t he catalytic centers involved in the hydrogenation steps and in the C-S bon d cleavage steps, (C) 2000 Academic Press.