A COMPARISON OF IMMUNOMAGNETIC AND SURFACE-ADHESION IMMUNOFLUORESCENTTECHNIQUES FOR THE RAPID DETECTION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES AND LISTERIA-INNOCUA IN MEAT
G. Duffy et al., A COMPARISON OF IMMUNOMAGNETIC AND SURFACE-ADHESION IMMUNOFLUORESCENTTECHNIQUES FOR THE RAPID DETECTION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES AND LISTERIA-INNOCUA IN MEAT, Letters in applied microbiology, 24(6), 1997, pp. 445-450
An immunomagnetic immunofluorescent method was investigated for the ra
pid detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innouca. This tec
hnique involved enrichment of the suspect sample at 30 degrees C overn
ight. Listeria monocytogenes cells were isolated from the enriched sam
ple using immunomagnetic separation and Listeria were subsequently vis
ualized using an immunofluorescent microscopy technique. This techniqu
e was used in the detection of Listeria cells from pure culture, inocu
lated beef mince samples and naturally contaminated retail beef mince
samples, A detection level of approximately 1 x 10(3) cfu ml(-1) was a
chieved. When compared with traditional detection methods no false neg
atives or positives were recorded for L. monocytogenes or L. innocua.
The immunomagnetic immunofluorescent technique had a detection level s
imilar to a previously described surface adhesion immunofluorescent te
chnique. Isolation of the Listeria cells by surface adhesion involved
dipping a membrane attached to a microscope slide into the enriched sa
mple for 10 min. This was quicker and simpler to perform than the immu
nomagnetic separation technique which took 2 h to carry out.