A COMPARISON OF IMMUNOMAGNETIC AND SURFACE-ADHESION IMMUNOFLUORESCENTTECHNIQUES FOR THE RAPID DETECTION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES AND LISTERIA-INNOCUA IN MEAT

Citation
G. Duffy et al., A COMPARISON OF IMMUNOMAGNETIC AND SURFACE-ADHESION IMMUNOFLUORESCENTTECHNIQUES FOR THE RAPID DETECTION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES AND LISTERIA-INNOCUA IN MEAT, Letters in applied microbiology, 24(6), 1997, pp. 445-450
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Biothechnology & Applied Migrobiology
ISSN journal
02668254
Volume
24
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
445 - 450
Database
ISI
SICI code
0266-8254(1997)24:6<445:ACOIAS>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
An immunomagnetic immunofluorescent method was investigated for the ra pid detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innouca. This tec hnique involved enrichment of the suspect sample at 30 degrees C overn ight. Listeria monocytogenes cells were isolated from the enriched sam ple using immunomagnetic separation and Listeria were subsequently vis ualized using an immunofluorescent microscopy technique. This techniqu e was used in the detection of Listeria cells from pure culture, inocu lated beef mince samples and naturally contaminated retail beef mince samples, A detection level of approximately 1 x 10(3) cfu ml(-1) was a chieved. When compared with traditional detection methods no false neg atives or positives were recorded for L. monocytogenes or L. innocua. The immunomagnetic immunofluorescent technique had a detection level s imilar to a previously described surface adhesion immunofluorescent te chnique. Isolation of the Listeria cells by surface adhesion involved dipping a membrane attached to a microscope slide into the enriched sa mple for 10 min. This was quicker and simpler to perform than the immu nomagnetic separation technique which took 2 h to carry out.