M. Ashworth et al., Motivating general practitioners to change their prescribing: the incentive of working together, J CLIN PH T, 25(2), 2000, pp. 119-124
Objective: To determine the extent to which GPs were motivated to change th
eir prescribing upon joining a Primary Care Commissioning Group (PCCG) and
how effective certain interventions planned by the PCCG might be as a means
to change prescribing. To define the characteristics of GPs less motivated
to change their prescribing.
Design: A cross-sectional survey of participating general practitioners lin
ked with current prescribing information derived from PACT data.
Setting: General practice covering a geographical locality within inner-cit
y south London.
Subjects: All 72 general practitioners who had joined a GP Commissioning Gr
oup.
Main outcome measures: questionnaire responses.
Results: 93% of GPs entering the GP Commissioning Group expected their pres
cribing to change but none expected substantial change. There was no differ
ence between fundholders, singlehanders nor training practices in their exp
ectation of change. GPs in practices with the lowest quality prescribing, a
s measured by a quality index, were least likely to expect change (Spearman
's r = 0.25, P = 0.04). Those in practices with higher prescribing costs we
re not more likely to expect their prescribing to change, whereas expensive
prescribers who were unaware of their practices' prescribing costs were as
sociated with a reduced expectation of prescribing change (P = 0.05). Educa
tional interventions were thought to be the most effective means by which p
rescribing could be changed, whereas formularies and financial factors were
perceived as weaker influences.
Conclusions: Acceptance of a cash-limited prescribing budget by GPs is acco
mpanied by the expectation of personal prescribing change. The motivation t
o change prescribing may be related to a strongly developed collectivist pe
rspective amongst GPs who are prepared to consider the prescribing implicat
ions for their fellow GPs. It is ironic that those with the least expectati
on of change should have the lowest quality prescribing, or be unaware of t
heir high cost prescribing. Engendering greater commitment to the professio
nal group may be one way of changing their prescribing.