Over 20 recent antitrust cases have turned on whether competition in comple
x durable-equipment markets prevents manufacturers from exercising market p
ower over proprietary aftermarket products and services. We show that the p
rice in the aftermarket trill exceed marginal cost despite competition in t
he equipment market. Absent perfectly contingent long-term contracts, firms
will balance the advantages of marginal-cost pricing to future generations
of consumers against the payoff from monopoly pricing for current, locked-
in equipment owners. The result holds for undifferentiated Bertrand competi
tion, differentiated duopoly, and monopoly equipment markets. We also exami
ne the effects of market growth and equipment durability.