This study was designed to explore the risk strategy employed in compl
ex settings by conducting an empirical analysis of 1212 decisions made
in the UK offcourse betting marker. The decision-making environment c
hosen for the study is identified as offering the advantages of a natu
ralistic setting and providing scope for observing risk strategy in a
range of alternative- and attribute-based complexity conditions. Speci
fically, the investigation employs a probit model to test the hypothes
is that increasing either attribute- or alternative-based complexity r
esults in the employment of a strategy more averse to risk-taking. The
results suggest that this is the case and that complexity associated
with alternatives has a particularly significant effect on the way bet
ters respond to the existence of risk. It is observed that these findi
ngs corroborate earlier studies of decision processes and decision out
comes.