Pseudogenes are nonfunctional copies of protein-coding genes that are presu
med to evolve without selective constraints on their coding function. They
are of considerable utility in evolutionary genetics because, in the absenc
e of selection, different types of mutations in pseudogenes should have equ
al probabilities of fixation. This theoretical inference justifies the esti
mation of patterns of spontaneous mutation from the analysis of patterns of
substitutions in pseudogenes, Although it is possible to test whether pseu
dogene sequences evolve without constraints for their protein-coding functi
on, it is much more difficult to ascertain whether pseudogenes may affect f
itness in ways unrelated to their nucleotide sequence. Consider the possibi
lity that a pseudogene affects fitness merely by increasing genome size. If
a larger genome is deleterious-for example, because of increased energetic
costs associated with genome replication and maintenance-then deletions, w
hich decrease the length of a pseudogene, should be selectively advantageou
s relative to insertions or nucleotide substitutions. In this article we ex
amine the implications of selection for genome size relative to small (1-40
0 bp) deletions, in light of empirical evidence pertaining to the size dist
ribution of deletions observed in Drosophila and mammalian pseudogenes, The
re is a large difference in the deletion spectra between these organisms. W
e argue that this difference cannot easily be attributed to selection for o
verall genome size, since the magnitude of selection is unlikely to be stro
ng enough to significantly affect the probability of fixation of small dele
tions in Drosophila.