The regressivity of the gasoline tax and other consumption taxes has b
een challenged on the grounds that the use of annual as opposed to lif
etime income and consumption data leads to a substantial overestimate
of regressivity. Rather than rely on proxies for lifetime income, in t
his paper panel data on gasoline consumption and income are used to me
asure incidence over an intermediate time period. When people are grou
ped into 11-year average income deciles, average gasoline tax burdens
are only slightly less regressive than annual burdens. The main reason
for the similarity of annual and intermediate-run burdens is the limi
ted degree of income mobility over an 11-year period.