Botulinum toxin (Dysport (R)) treatment of hip adductor spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging study
N. Hyman et al., Botulinum toxin (Dysport (R)) treatment of hip adductor spasticity in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, dose ranging study, J NE NE PSY, 68(6), 2000, pp. 707-712
Objective-To define a safe and effective dose of Dysport for treating hip a
dductor spasticity.
Methods-Patients with definite or probable multiple sclerosis, and disablin
g spasticity affecting the hip adductor muscles of both legs, were randomis
ed to one of four treatment groups. Dysport (500, 1000, or 1500 Units), or
placebo was administered by intramuscular injection to these muscles. Patie
nts were assessed at entry, and 2, 4 (primary analysis time-point), 8, and
12 weeks post-treatment.
Results-A total of 74 patients were recruited. Treatment groups were genera
lly well matched at entry. The primary efficacy variables-passive hip abduc
tion and distance between the knees-improved for all groups. The improvemen
t in distance between the knees for the 1500 Unit group was significantly g
reater than placebo (p=0.02). Spasm frequency was reduced in all groups, bu
t muscle tone was reduced in the Dysport groups only. Pain was reduced in a
ll groups, but improvements in hygiene scores were evident only in the 1000
Unit and 1500 Unit groups. Duration of benefit was significantly longer th
an placebo for all Dysport groups (p<0.05). Adverse events were reported by
32/58 (55%) Dysport patients, and by 10/16 (63%) placebo patients. Compare
d with the two lower dose groups, twice as many adverse events were reporte
d by the 1500 Unit group (2.7/patient). The incidence of muscle weakness wa
s higher for the 1500 Unit group (36%) than for placebo (6%). The response
to treatment was considered positive by two thirds of the patients in the 5
00 Unit group, and by about half the patients in the other groups.
Conclusion-Dysport reduced the degree of hip adductor spasticity associated
with multiple sclerosis, and this benefit was evident despite the concomit
ant use of oral antispasticity medication and analgesics. Although evidence
for a dose response effect was not statistically significant, there was a
clear trend towards greater efficacy and duration of effect with higher dos
es of Dysport. Dysport treatment was well tolerated, with no major side eff
ects seen at doses up to 1500 Units. The optimal dose for hip adductor spas
ticity seems to be 500-1000 Units, divided between both legs.