A. Hollander et al., EXPOSURE OF LABORATORY-ANIMAL WORKERS TO AIRBORNE RAT AND MOUSE URINARY ALLERGENS, Clinical and experimental allergy, 27(6), 1997, pp. 617-626
Background Laboratory animal workers are at high risk of developing oc
cupational allergy. Little is known about the relationship between lev
els of exposure and the risk of developing laboratory animal anergy. S
ince laboratory animal work comprises a large number of different - of
ten short lasting - tasks, it is of interest to assess which activitie
s are associated with high, low or intermediate levels of allergen exp
osure. Objective To develop and evaluate highly sensitive immunoassays
in order to quantify rat and mouse urinary allergens in airborne dust
sampled during short-lasting tasks. Methods Personal air dust samples
were taken during full-shift periods as well as during specific tasks
in seven laboratory animal facilities. Two sandwich enzyme immunoassa
ys were developed, using rabbit antisera against rat and mouse urinary
proteins. The rabbit antibodies were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfa
te-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting an
d compared with IgE antibodies from sensitized laboratory animal worke
rs. Results The rabbit antibodies were highly specific for rat and mou
se urinary proteins and reacted with all IgE-binding allergens in eith
er urinary protein preparation. The assays for rat and mouse urine wer
e very sensitive, with detection limits of 0.075 ng/mL. The coefficien
t of variation of the analysis was 12.9% for both assays. Animal caret
akers appeared to experience the highest exposure to aeroallergens. A
large variation in exposure within jobs was found, due to differences
between tasks performed during the sampling day and the facility worke
d at. The highest exposure levels were found during removal of contami
nated bedding from the cages. However, rat and mouse allergen exposure
levels during this task varied enormously between facilities, 1.1-158
ng eq/m(3) and 0.63-2000 ng eq/m(3), respectively. Conclusion Both sa
ndwich immunoassays are highly specific and sensitive and are able to
identify tasks of relatively short duration with high, medium and low
exposure to airborne rat and mouse urinary allergens.