In this paper, the optimum family size in a progeny test with limited testi
ng facilities was determined for a scheme where several commercial companie
s were competing. Companies which determined family size in order to maximi
ze the expected proportion of sires that will be selected from its stock we
re considered as competitive. On the other hand, companies that determined
family size in order to maximize the expected genetic progress were conside
red as altruist. Using the theory of games, it was shown that competitive c
ompanies obtain better commercial results than altruist companies. When com
peting against competitive companies, altruist companies obtained worse com
mercial results than they expected. When all companies were competitive, th
e commercial results equalled those when all were altruist, but the total g
enetic progress decreased. A numerical procedure is described to calculate
the family size to optimize the commercial results. The result of this algo
rithm showed that this commercial equilibrium depends only on the heritabil
ity and the ratio between the total testing facilities of the population an
d the number of sires required for the market. This commercial equilibrium
did not depend on the number of companies or the size of each company. (C)
2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.