Perspective effects in the Wason four-card selection task occur when people
choose mutually exclusive sets of cards depending on the perspective they
adopt when making their choice. Previous demonstrations of perspective effe
cts have been limited to deontic contexts-that is, problem contexts that in
volve social duty, like permissions and obligations. In three experiments,
we demonstrate perspective effects in nondeontic contexts, including a cont
ext much like the original one employed by Wason (1966, 1968). We suggest t
hat perspective effects arise whenever the task uses a rule that can be int
erpreted biconditionally and different perspectives elicit different counte
rexamples that match the predicted choice sets. This view is consistent wit
h domain-general theories but not with domain-specific theories of deontic
reasoning-for example, pragmatic reasoning schemas and social contract theo
ry-that cannot explain perspective effects in nondeontic contexts.