Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores, calcula
ted within the first 24 h of admission, were analysed in 108 patients with
acute renal failure due to falciparum malaria who were admitted to Bangkok
Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Thailand. Twelve (11.1%) patients died. The
mean APACHE III score was 82.0+/-25.5 (range, 45-171). There was a close r
elation between the APACHE III score and the hospital mortality rate. The n
on-survivors had significantly higher APACHE III scores than the survivors,
109.8+/-36.7 and 75.7+/-21.6, respectively (P<0.001). Patients with APACHE
III score greater than or equal to 82 had a 4.2-fold higher risk of dying
compared with patients with a lower score (95% CI 1.2-14.7; P=0.013). Haemo
dialysis treatment was performed in 97 (89.8%) of the patients. The mean AP
ACHE III score for patients who were not treated with haemodialysis (95.9+/
-38.0) was not significantly higher than those were received haemodialysis
(80.4+/-23.5; P>0.05), but the former had a 4.4-times higher risk of dying
compared with those dialysed (95% CI 1.6-12.3; P=0.019). Using the APACHE I
II score and its ability to predict death, we calculated its sensitivity, s
pecificity and accuracy to be 0.92, 0.31 and 0.41, respectively, at a cut-o
ff score of 67 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic
(ROC) curve was 0.75. The APACHE III scoring system correlated well with t
he outcome of critically ill malaria patients with acute renal failure, alt
hough it was not possible to identify individual survivors or non-survivors
. APACHE III should not be used for individual prognosis or treatment decis
ions.