Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages

Citation
I. Reinvang et al., Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages, NEUROPSYCHO, 38(7), 2000, pp. 995-1005
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
ISSN journal
00283932 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
995 - 1005
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3932(2000)38:7<995:IPDIHI>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
ERPs provide informative measures of slowed information processing in head injury. While several studies have reported changes in long latency ERPs (N 2, P3) in head injury, the data on early ERP components related to attentio n selection are inconclusive. The problem may be partly methodological beca use the standard oddball paradigm does not give an adequate basis for discr iminating components contributing to the N1 and P2 waveforms. Following a s uggestion by Garcia-Larrea et al. [10: Garcia-Larrea L, Lukasziewicz A-C, M augiere F. Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs neutral stimuli a nd the evaluation of ERP attention effects. Neuropsychologia 1992;30:723-74 1] we used an extended oddball paradigm to study measures of early processi ng (N1-average, P250) as well as conventional cognitive ERPs (N1, P2, N2, P 3) in a group of head injured patients and controls. We found evidence of d eficits in early processing of neutral and non-target stimuli in the patien t group, and interpret the findings as an indication that the patients are less efficient in terminating processing of irrelevant stimuli. The results further indicate that processing deviations affect both target and non-tar get stimuli in the oddball paradigm and thus the allocation of attention in the task as a whole. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.