I. Kodama et al., Regional differences in arrhythmogenic aftereffects of high intensity DC stimulation in the ventricles, PACE, 23(5), 2000, pp. 807-817
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Regional differences of the aftereffects of high intensity DC stimulation w
ere investigated in isolated rabbit hearts stained with a voltage-sensitive
dye (di-4-ANEPPS). Optical action potential signals were recorded from the
epicardial surface of the right and left ventricular free wall (RVep, LVep
) and from the right endocardial surface of the interventricular septum (IV
S). Ten-millisecond monophasic DC stimulation (S-2, 20-120 V) was applied t
o the signal recording spots during the early plateau phase of the action p
otential induced by basic stimuli (S-1, 2.5 Hz). There was a Linear relatio
nship between St voltage and the S-2 field intentisy (FI). S-1 caused posts
hock additional depolarization, giving rise to a prolongation of the shocke
d action potential. With S-2 greater than or equal to 40 V (Fi greater than
or equal to similar to 20 V/cm), terminal repolarization of action potenti
al wets inhibited, and subsequent postshock S-2 action potentials for 1-5 m
inutes were characterized by a decrease in the maximum diastolic potential
and a decrease in the amplitude and a slowing of their upstroke phase. The
higher the S-1 voltage, the larger the aftereffects. The changes in postsho
ck action potential configuration in RVep were significantly greater than t
hose observed in LVep and IVS when compared at the same levels of St intens
ity. In RVep, 12 of 20 shocks of 120 V resulted in a prolonged refractorine
ss to S-1 (> 1 s), and the arrest was often followed by oscillation of memb
rane potential. Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation ensued from the osc
illation in five cases. No such long arrest or serious arrhythmias were eli
cited in LVep and NS. These results suggest that RVep is more susceptible t
han LVep and IVS for arrhythmogenic aftereffects of high intensity DC stimu
lation.