Comparing leaders' ratings to targets' self-reported resistance to task assignments: An extension of Chester Barnard's zones of indifference

Authors
Citation
Je. Barbuto, Comparing leaders' ratings to targets' self-reported resistance to task assignments: An extension of Chester Barnard's zones of indifference, PSYCHOL REP, 86(2), 2000, pp. 611-621
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS
ISSN journal
00332941 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
611 - 621
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-2941(200004)86:2<611:CLRTTS>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
This description and preliminary rest of target resistance compared leaders ' with targets' ratings of the targets' willingness to perform the nature o f tasks assigned by leaders. Barbuto's concentric zones were used to Lest t his difference in perceived resistance. The concentric zones-Preference, In difference, Legitimate, Influence, and Noninfluence-were examined from both leaders' and targets' perspectives. Response from 201 leaders and targets demonstrated that leaders and followers generally reported the anticipated resistance of assigned tasks differently. Specifically, leaders rated the t asks they assigned to targets as less enjoyable, undesirable, more above th e call of duty, and more likely to be resisted than targets self-reported.