A recent paper in this Journal by Kaplan and Zingales reexamines a subset o
f firms from work of Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen and criticizes the usef
ulness of investment-cash flow sensitivities for detecting financing constr
aints. We show that the Kaplan and Zingales theoretical model fails to capt
ure the approach employed in the literature and thus does not provide an ef
fective critique. Moreover, we describe why their empirical classification
system is flawed in identifying both whether firms are constrained and the
relative degree of constraints across firm groups. We conclude that their r
esults do not support their conclusions about the usefulness of investment-
cash flow sensitivities.