Work by Kaplan and Zingales provides both theoretical arguments and empiric
al evidence that investment-cash flow sensitivities are not good indicators
of financing constraints. Fazzari, Hubbard, and Petersen [this Journal] cr
iticize those findings. In this note we explain how the Fazzari et al. crit
icisms are either very supportive of the claims in earlier work by Kaplan a
nd Zingales or incorrect. We conclude with a discussion of unanswered quest
ions.