Repeatability of the ISAAC video questionnaire and its accuracy against a clinical diagnosis of asthma

Citation
L. Fuso et al., Repeatability of the ISAAC video questionnaire and its accuracy against a clinical diagnosis of asthma, RESP MED, 94(4), 2000, pp. 397-403
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546111 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
397 - 403
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(200004)94:4<397:ROTIVQ>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Internati onal Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) video questionnaire in terms of repeatability and accuracy against a clinical diagnosis of ast hma achieved according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHL BI) algorithm. Two hundred and forty-one subjects, aged 13-14 years from two secondary sch ools in Rome, Italy, were enrolled. Video and written ISAAC questionnaires were completed twice, 3 months apart, by 194 and 190 adolescents, respectiv ely. Two months later, 106 subjects were visited by two physicians blinded to the results of questionnaires. Sixteen subjects were classified as having clinical asthma (CA) at the clin ical visit, and eight of them as having clinical active asthma (CAA) on the basis of at least one positive outcome of the NHLBI algorithm. The repeata bility of video questionnaire was similar to that of the written questionna ire for items on exercise wheeze and nocturnal cough and, to a lesser degre e, for items concerning any wheeze in the past. The video questionnaire sho wed a worse performance than the written questionnaire for items on asthma attack: K-value (95% CL) = 0.59 (0.37-0.80) for video scene no. 5 and K-val ue (95% CL)= 0.86 (0.74-0.98)for written question no. 6. The overall accura cy of the video questionnaire, estimated as a positive answer to any video scene, was lower in terms of sensitivity than that of any written question when CA was used as a gold standard (0.50 vs. 0.81, P = 0.025) and increase d with respect to CAA (0.75 vs. 0.87, P = 0.317). The specificity of any vi deo scene was better than that of any written question, independently from the gold standard used. In conclusion, the video questionnaire showed a fairly good accuracy, altho ugh slightly lower than that of the written questionnaire and provided suff iciently reliable results. However, samples of subjects from different geog raphic areas and cultures should be studied in order to conclusively define the performance of the ISAAC video geo questionnaire.