Jp. Moatti et al., A review of socio-behavioural studies on adherence to antiretroviral treatments: beyond biomedical models?, REV EPIDEM, 48(2), 2000, pp. 182-197
This paper, based on a review of the literature of socio-behavioural resear
ch in this field, shows how the AIDS epidemic has renewed traditional appro
aches to patients behaviour toward medical treatment by substituting the no
tion of adherence for the traditional one of compliance. It shows how this
issue of patients adherence has come to the forefront of HIV care with the
recent diffusion of highly active antiretroviral therapeutics (HAART), beca
use inadequate adherence has profound implications for the individual and p
ublic heath effectiveness of these therapeutic advances. The paper argues t
hat two alternatives and indeed conflicting, approaches to adherence to tre
atment in HIV infection however persist. The aim of the first approach rema
ins to predict and correct non-adherent behaviour in certain patients and s
ometimes suggests that such predictions may provide justification far denyi
ng individuals treatment. This "predictive" approach focuses on identificat
ion of individual barriers to "good" adherence and calls on social science
research to help improve the "acceptability" of prescribed regimens for pat
ients. An alternative "empathic" approach focuses more on encouraging and s
upporting all HIV-infected patients medically eligible for HAART to devise
appropriate individualised plans that cart facilitate management of their t
reatment in their daily life. This latter approach more willingly learn fro
m social science research which recognises the patient's subjective experie
nce of illness as a central concern. In the future, the respective contribu
tions of these two alternative approaches will have to be judged on the bas
is of their capacity to analyse both the factors which influence HIV-infect
ed patients' initial adherence to antiretroviral treatment and those, poten
tially quite different which interfere with adherence on the long term. The
y will also be judged for their capacity to inspire effective psychological
and socio-behavioural interventions aimed at facilitating patients adheren
ce.