This article takes a look at the critical period in the development of ther
apeutic tests on aids, marked by a number of public debates on the ethics a
nd the methodology behind these tests. It shows the polarization of the spe
cialist space (doctors, statisticians) with several testing philosophies. I
t puts forward the opposition between two generations of doctor and statist
ician; one, very attached to the public agency and more usually to medical
research institutions, oriented towards a controlled design of medical scie
nce and clinical practice, the other is engaged more rapidly in aids claimi
ng a new form in the distribution of relationships between science and clin
ical matters. The article specifies the structural position, in this space,
of doctors who criticize globally the codified procedures which at present
organize ethics and the scientific character of medical research. It shows
what this period reveals about epistemic mutations in our societies and in
contemporary medicine.