The clinical outcome after successful conventional coronary balloon angiopl
asty is compared with that of stent implantation after 30 days and 12 month
s. The study took place at the Divisions of Cardiology and Thoracic Radiolo
gy, Norrland University Hospital, Umea, a referral centre for northern Swed
en. The first 100 consecutive patients with stable or unstable angina under
going successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in 1
994 and the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing successful coronary s
tent implantation in 1995 were included. The cardiac endpoints studied were
death, myocardial infarction, need for repeat PTCA or coronary artery bypa
ss grafting (CABG). Significantly mon adverse cardiac events were observed
in the PTCA group compared with the stent group. Event-free 12 months' foll
ow-up (no deaths, myocardial infarction or re-intervention) was 64% in the
PTCA group and 86% in the stent group (p < 0.005). The main explanation for
the observed difference was a reduction in the need for a repeat PTCA (7 v
s 18, p < 0.05) or CABG (4 vs 12, p < 0.05) in the stent group. Patients wi
th stable or unstable angina who can be treated with a stent have a better
clinical outcome than those treated with coronary balloon angioplasty only.