Cc. Bohn et Jg. King, Stream channel responses to streamflow diversion on small streams of the Snake River drainage, Idaho, USDA F SERV, (RP-20), 2000, pp. 1
The effects on channels of small, low-head seasonal water diversions in the
Snake River drainage were investigated. Channels below small diversions we
re compared to the channels immediately above the same diversions to determ
ine if differences in flow conveyance, substrate sediment size distribution
, or streamside vegetation density were present. Estimates of flow conveyan
ce were greater above the diversions, as measured by the area between the e
dges of vegetation on both banks, and by frequent-flow indicators, which ge
nerally approximated bankfull stage. No significant difference in substrate
particle size or in channel roughness was found between channels above and
below diversions. Although use histories of the diversions were not availa
ble, limited observations and conversations with users suggest that many of
the diversion structures did not substantially divert high springtime flow
s so that passage of channel-forming flows probably occurred. Some diversio
n structures apparently divert or trap a portion of the bedload. Stem diame
ters of vegetation 6 to 48 inches above the ground were significantly large
r above the diversions. Tests of stem densities were not significant. Strat
ification by substrate, season and size of diversion, community type, and s
ource of summer water may be necessary to properly evaluate the effects of
small diversions on vegetation stem density and vigor. The elevation of the
edge of vegetation appears to be a viable alternative to frequent flow or
bankfull indicators for estimating flow conveyance. It also addresses the q
uestion of vegetative encroachment into the channel. Use of the edge of veg
etation as a channel feature for flow estimates merits further testing. It
appears that the operation of the small forest stream diversions studied ha
s not substantially altered most of the parameters studied. Past hydrograph
s and historical hydrologic data, however, are needed to fully evaluate the
channel and vegetation responses.