Stream channel responses to streamflow diversion on small streams of the Snake River drainage, Idaho

Authors
Citation
Cc. Bohn et Jg. King, Stream channel responses to streamflow diversion on small streams of the Snake River drainage, Idaho, USDA F SERV, (RP-20), 2000, pp. 1
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Issue
RP-20
Year of publication
2000
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
The effects on channels of small, low-head seasonal water diversions in the Snake River drainage were investigated. Channels below small diversions we re compared to the channels immediately above the same diversions to determ ine if differences in flow conveyance, substrate sediment size distribution , or streamside vegetation density were present. Estimates of flow conveyan ce were greater above the diversions, as measured by the area between the e dges of vegetation on both banks, and by frequent-flow indicators, which ge nerally approximated bankfull stage. No significant difference in substrate particle size or in channel roughness was found between channels above and below diversions. Although use histories of the diversions were not availa ble, limited observations and conversations with users suggest that many of the diversion structures did not substantially divert high springtime flow s so that passage of channel-forming flows probably occurred. Some diversio n structures apparently divert or trap a portion of the bedload. Stem diame ters of vegetation 6 to 48 inches above the ground were significantly large r above the diversions. Tests of stem densities were not significant. Strat ification by substrate, season and size of diversion, community type, and s ource of summer water may be necessary to properly evaluate the effects of small diversions on vegetation stem density and vigor. The elevation of the edge of vegetation appears to be a viable alternative to frequent flow or bankfull indicators for estimating flow conveyance. It also addresses the q uestion of vegetative encroachment into the channel. Use of the edge of veg etation as a channel feature for flow estimates merits further testing. It appears that the operation of the small forest stream diversions studied ha s not substantially altered most of the parameters studied. Past hydrograph s and historical hydrologic data, however, are needed to fully evaluate the channel and vegetation responses.