Sj. Dibiase et al., Standard off-cord lung oblique fields do not include the entire mediastinum - A computed tomography simulator study, AM J CL ONC, 23(3), 2000, pp. 249-252
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
The routinely recommended target volume for off-cord lung oblique fields in
the treatment of postoperative bronchogenic carcinoma includes the entire
mediastinum, as defined by coverage of the contralateral mainstem bronchus
and subcarinal space. However, this may be difficult to accomplish with the
field angles of 20 degrees to 40 degrees, recommended in the recently comp
leted Intergroup Trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-05). This proje
ct was undertaken to define the oblique angle necessary to encompass the en
tire mediastinum as determined by computerized tomography simulator verific
ation. Axial computerized tomography simulation images of 25 patients with
non-small-cell lung cancer were used in this study. Ten patients had prior
lobectomy or pneumonectomy as part of their management. The contralateral m
ainstem bronchus, subcarinal space (SS), and the spinal cord were each cont
oured as separate volumes. The length of the contralateral mainstem bronchu
s was defined as extending from the carina to the bifurcation of the lobar
bronchi. The subcarinal space was defined as a triangular space (in a coron
al plane) with the carina at the apex, the mainstem bronchi superiorly, and
a horizontal line 5 cm below the carina as the base of the triangle. The m
inimal angle to encompass the contralateral mainstem bronchus and subcarina
l space, and to exclude the spinal cord was determined for each patient. Th
e contoured volumes did not have additional margin added. The position of t
he carina was scored as "midline" if located in the midsagittal plane, or "
off-midline" if deviated to either side from midline. Midline deviation was
determined at the level of the carina to evaluate possible anatomical dist
ortion relating to the tumor or prior surgery, and its effect on the minima
l angle was assessed. The median minimal angle measured was 45 degrees (ran
ge: 28-65 degrees) for the entire group, and in 64% of those evaluated, thi
s oblique angle was significantly greater than the 40 degrees recommended i
n Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines (p = 0.017). In patients with
out midline deviation (n = 17), the median minimal angle was 45 degrees (ra
nge: 28-60 degrees), and in patients with midline deviation (n = 8), it was
determined to be 44 degrees (range: 27-65 degrees), with no statistical di
fference noted between the two groups (p = NS). Although midline deviation
was present in 4 of 10 patients previously resected, the above relationship
remained unchanged. Based on computerized tomography simulation verificati
on, off-cord oblique field angles of 20 degrees to 40 degrees do not adequa
tely cover the entire mediastinum in most patients. To adequately encompass
the entire mediastinum as defined in the Intergroup Trial (Radiation Thera
py Oncology Group 91-05) with off-cord oblique fields, treatment angles gre
ater than 40 degrees are necessary. Whether the potential increase in lung
volume exposed to radiation from these larger angles results in a poorer th
erapeutic ratio requires further investigation.