Almost all human diseases have been shown to aggregate familially to some d
egree. This familiality is generally taken as evidence for the existence of
a genetic etiologic mechanism or environmental factors common to family me
mbers, or a combination of both. It has been argued that for a disease with
strong familiar aggregation, environmental risk factors alone are unlikely
to account for such strong aggregation, unless the presumed environmental
risk factors are associated with enormous risk. This paper revisits this is
sue through the use of a novel statistical model. Ascertainment bias aside,
the author demonstrates that familial aggregation could be explained by mu
ltiple interactive risk factors, each of which may confer a low disease ris
k and thus contribute only a minuscule portion to disease familiarity. For
example, two correlated risk factors (r = 0.5), each with a relative risk o
f 5 and acting multiplicatively, could give rise to a sibling relative risk
of 1.96. Therefore, it may not be sufficient to argue for a genetic compon
ent for a disease based solely on the notion that no high risk environmenta
l factors have been found. In view of this, there is a need to examine care
fully the roles of multiple environmental risk factors in disease familiari
ty.