Intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation evoke different effects on caval vein pressure gradients in humans - Evidence for theStarling resistor concept abdominal venous return
Rm. Giebler et al., Intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation evoke different effects on caval vein pressure gradients in humans - Evidence for theStarling resistor concept abdominal venous return, ANESTHESIOL, 92(6), 2000, pp. 1568-1580
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: The authors hypothesized that intraperitoneal and retroperitone
al carbon dioxide insufflation during surgical procedures evoke markedly di
fferent effects on the venous low-pressure system, induce different inferio
r caval vein pressure gradients at similar insufflation pressures, and may
provide evidence for the Starling resistor concept of abdominal venous retu
rn.
Methods: Intra- and extrathoracic caval vein pressures were measured using
micromanometers during carbon dioxide insufflation at six cavity pressures
(baseline and 10, 15, 20, and 24 mmHg and desufflation) in 20 anesthetized
patients undergoing laparoscopic (supine, n = 8) or left (n = 6) or right (
n = 6) retroperitoneoscopic (prone position) surgery. Intracavital, esophag
eal, and gastric pressures also were assessed. Data were analyzed for insuf
flation pressure-dependent and group effects by one-way and two-way analysi
s of variance for repeated measurements, respectively, followed by the Newm
an-Keuls post hoc test (P < 0.05).
Results: Intraperitoneal, unlike retroperitoneal, insufflation markedly inc
reased, in an insufflation pressure-dependent fashion, the inferior-to-supe
rior caval vein pressure gradient (P < 0.00001) at the level of the diaphra
gm. In contrast to what was observed with retroperitoneal insufflation, tra
nsmural intrathoracic caval vein pressure increased at 10 mmHg insufflation
pressure, but the increase flattened with an insufflation pressure of more
than 10 mmHg, and pressure decreased with an inflation pressure of 20 mmHg
(P = 0.0397). These data are consistent with a zone 2 or 3 abdominal vascu
lar condition during intraperitoneal and a zone 3 abdominal vascular condit
ion during retroperitoneal insufflation.
Conclusions: Intraperitoneal but not retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insuffl
ation evokes a transition of the abdominal venous compartment from a zone 3
to a zone 2 condition, presumably impairing venous return, supporting the
Starling resistor concept of abdominal venous return in humans.