Ardeparin sodium for extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Citation
Ja. Heit et al., Ardeparin sodium for extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, ANN INT MED, 132(11), 2000, pp. 853
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00034819 → ACNP
Volume
132
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(20000606)132:11<853:ASFEOP>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Background: The optimal duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembol ism after total hip or knee replacement is uncertain. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (ardeparin sodium). Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: 33 community, university, or university-affiliated hospitals. Patients: 1195 adults who had elective total hip or knee replacement and co mpleted 4 to 10 days of postoperative ardeparin prophylaxis. Intervention: Daily subcutaneous ardeparin (100 anti-X-a IU/kg of body weig ht) or placebo from time of hospital discharge to 6 weeks after surgery. Measurements: Symptomatic, objectively documented venous thromboembolism or death, along with major bleeding, from time of hospital discharge to 12 we eks after surgery. Results: Patients who received ardeparin (n = 607) and those who received p lacebo (n = 588) did not differ significantly in the cumulative incidence o f venous thromboembolism or death (9 cases [1.5%] compared with 12 cases [2 .0%]; odds ratio, 0.7 [95% Cl, 0.3 to 1.7]; P > 0.2; absolute difference, - 0.56 percentage points [Cl, -2.2 to 1.1 percentage points]) or major bleedi ng (2 cases [0.3%] compared with 3 cases [0.5%]). Conclusions: Among patients who had total knee or total hip replacement and received 4 to 10 days of postoperative ardeparin prophylaxis, the cumulati ve incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or death after hospital discharge was not significantly reduced by extended out-of-hospital ardepar in prophylaxis. Extended ardeparin use could provide a maximum 2.2-percenta ge point true reduction in such events. The benefit of extended ardeparin u se is not clinically important for patients. Future research should identif y high-risk patients who would benefit most from extended prophylaxis.