Ardeparin sodium for extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Ja. Heit et al., Ardeparin sodium for extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, ANN INT MED, 132(11), 2000, pp. 853
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: The optimal duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembol
ism after total hip or knee replacement is uncertain.
Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of extended out-of-hospital
prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (ardeparin sodium).
Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting: 33 community, university, or university-affiliated hospitals.
Patients: 1195 adults who had elective total hip or knee replacement and co
mpleted 4 to 10 days of postoperative ardeparin prophylaxis.
Intervention: Daily subcutaneous ardeparin (100 anti-X-a IU/kg of body weig
ht) or placebo from time of hospital discharge to 6 weeks after surgery.
Measurements: Symptomatic, objectively documented venous thromboembolism or
death, along with major bleeding, from time of hospital discharge to 12 we
eks after surgery.
Results: Patients who received ardeparin (n = 607) and those who received p
lacebo (n = 588) did not differ significantly in the cumulative incidence o
f venous thromboembolism or death (9 cases [1.5%] compared with 12 cases [2
.0%]; odds ratio, 0.7 [95% Cl, 0.3 to 1.7]; P > 0.2; absolute difference, -
0.56 percentage points [Cl, -2.2 to 1.1 percentage points]) or major bleedi
ng (2 cases [0.3%] compared with 3 cases [0.5%]).
Conclusions: Among patients who had total knee or total hip replacement and
received 4 to 10 days of postoperative ardeparin prophylaxis, the cumulati
ve incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or death after hospital
discharge was not significantly reduced by extended out-of-hospital ardepar
in prophylaxis. Extended ardeparin use could provide a maximum 2.2-percenta
ge point true reduction in such events. The benefit of extended ardeparin u
se is not clinically important for patients. Future research should identif
y high-risk patients who would benefit most from extended prophylaxis.