Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine

Citation
Pl. Carr et al., Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine, ANN INT MED, 132(11), 2000, pp. 889-896
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00034819 → ACNP
Volume
132
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
889 - 896
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(20000606)132:11<889:FPOGDA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background: Gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment are common in medical practice and may be even more prevalent in academic medicine. Objective: To examine the prevalence of gender-based discrimination and sex ual harassment among medical school faculty and the associations of gender- based discrimination with number of publications, career satisfaction, and perceptions of career advancement. Design: A self-administered mailed questionnaire of U.S. medical school fac ulty that covered a broad range of topics relating to academic life. Settin g: 24 randomly selected medical schools in the contiguous United States. Participants: A random sample of 3332 full-time faculty, stratified by spec ialty, graduation cohort, and sex. Measurements: Prevalence of self-reported experiences of discrimination and harassment, number of peer-reviewed publications, career satisfaction, and perception of career advancement. Results: Female faculty were more than 2.5 times more likely than male facu lty to perceive gender-based discrimination in the academic environment (P < 0.001). Among women, rates of reported discrimination ranged from 47% for the youngest faculty to 70% for the oldest faculty. Women who reported exp eriencing negative gender bias had similar productivity but lower career sa tisfaction scores than did other women (P ( 0.001). About half of female fa culty but few male faculty experienced some form of sexual harassment. Thes e experiences were similarly prevalent across the institutions in the sampl e and in all regions of the United States. Female faculty who reported bein g sexually harassed perceived gender-specific bias in the academic environm ent more often than did other women (80% compared with 61%) and more often reported experiencing gender bias in professional advancement (72% compared with 47%). Publications, career satisfaction, and professional confidence were not affected by sexual harassment, and self-assessed career advancemen t was only marginally lower for female faculty who had experienced sexual h arassment (P = 0.06). Conclusion: Despite substantial increases in the number of female faculty, reports of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment remain common.