Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: Interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the neurobehavioral rating scale-revised

Objective: To study interrater reliability and factorial and criterion vali dity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R). Design: Validity study on persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and tes t-retest reliability study on a randomly selected subset of patients. Facto r analyses, kappa statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Cron bach's alphas were used. Setting: Inpatients from 15 French hospitals, mainly rehabilitation units. Other recruitment sites included a neurology hospital unit and a psychiatry hospital specifically devoted to TBI rehabilitation. Patients: Two hundred eighty-six TBI patients ages 16 to 70 years (convenie nce sample). Results: For the reliability study, the average of percentages of agreement among the items was 74.3% and the average of kappa statistics was .40. Fac tor analyses disclosed a maximum likelihood extraction of 5 correlated fact ors (F), explaining 42.2% of total variance: (F1) deficits in intentional b ehavior and in memory, (F2) lowering of emotional state, (F3) emotional and behavioral hyperactivation, (F4) lowering of arousal state and of attentio n, and (F5) language and speech problems. Results support the criterion val idity of the factors. Reliability of the factor scores and internal consist encies of factors were very good. Conclusions: Results describe some important properties of the NRS-R and, t hrough an understanding of its underlying structure and relationships with the patients' clinical characteristics, contribute to the conceptual framew ork of neuropsychologic impairments after TBI.