The analytical frameworks used for thinking about the determinants of
the level of unemployment are not well-suited to thinking about the ef
fects of skill-biassed technical change. In this paper, we argue for m
aking relative wages as an argument of the labour supply function (or
wage curve) in order to explain the observed patterns of wage inequali
ty and unemployment. We argue that if this is done, we would expect la
bour market institutions to be much less important than is generally a
ssumed in determining labour market outcomes in the longer-run and tha
t policies towards education are likely to be much more important. We
illustrate this by arguing that the British public education system ef
fectively rations access to education and prevents market incentives f
rom working. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.