Objectives 1. To describe the relation between birthweight and risk of emer
gency caesarean section at term; 2. to determine whether the relation betwe
en birthweight and caesarean section differed between male and female babie
s; and 3. to determine what proportion of the increased rates of caesarean
section could be related to greater birthweights.
Design Retrospective population study. Data collected from Scottish Morbidi
ty Record 1980 to 1996.
Population Data All first singleton deliveries by emergency caesarean secti
on and non-elective vaginal birth of live babies at 40 weeks of gestation (
n = 120,854).
Main outcome measure Delivery by emergency caesarean section.
Results There was a U-shaped relation between birthweight and the risk of c
aesarean section, with the lowest risk associated with weights in the range
3000-3500 g. Overall, males were more likely to be delivered by caesarean
section (relative risk = 1 2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3). The association between male
sex and increased risk of caesarean section persisted after adjusting for
birthweight, but only males weighing < 4000 g were at increased risk of cae
sarean section compared with similarly sized females. Between 1980 and 1996
, there were linear increases in the rate of caesarean section (from 7.1% t
o 10.7%. r(2) = 0.8, P < 0.001) and median birthweight (from 3360 g in 1980
to 3420 g in 1996, r(2) = 0.8, P < 0.001). The population attributable fra
ction of caesarean sections related to year of delivery 1981-1996 was not s
ignificantly altered by adjusting for birthweight (22.3% vs 21.6%).
Conclusions There is no evidence to suggest that increasing birthweights ha
ve contributed to increasing rates of caesarean section in Scotland between
1980 and 1996 among singleton first births non-electively delivered at 40
weeks of gestation.