Cost, efficacy, efficiency and tolerability of collagenase ointment versushydrocolloid occlusive dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers - A comparative, randomised, multicentre study
A. Burgos et al., Cost, efficacy, efficiency and tolerability of collagenase ointment versushydrocolloid occlusive dressing in the treatment of pressure ulcers - A comparative, randomised, multicentre study, CLIN DRUG I, 19(5), 2000, pp. 357-365
Objective: Pressure ulcers are a common and costly healthcare problem. It i
s imperative to devise treatment methods that are simultaneously efficaciou
s and cost effective. The efficacy and tolerability of collagenase ointment
and hydrocolloid occlusive dressing have been proven in the treatment of p
ressure ulcers, but no comparative cost-efficacy studies have been reported
. The present study was carried out to compare the cost, efficacy, efficien
cy and tolerability of these two methods.
Design and Setting: This was a multicentre, randomised, nonblind, parallel
group study conducted at seven hospitals in Spain.
Patients: 37 evaluable patients of either gender aged 55 years or over havi
ng had stage III pressure ulcers for <1 year.
Methods: Reduction of ulcer area assessed at 1-week intervals was the prima
ry outcome measure. Pain, granulation tissue, exudate and odour were also e
valuated, as were nutrition state and occurrence of adverse reactions.
Results: No statistically significant differences in cost, efficacy or effi
ciency were detected between collagenase ointment and hydrocolloid dressing
in the treatment of pressure ulcers, although a trend for better efficacy
and efficiency of collagenase treatment was observed. The tolerability of b
oth therapeutic regimens was good. Conclusions: These findings indicate tha
t collagenase ointment and hydrocolloid dressing produced similar healing e
ffects in patients with pressure ulcers.