DNA profiling has brought to the courts a new way of looking at forensic sc
ience evidence. The weight of evidence, where there is a match between the
profiles of a defendant and a crime sample, is presented int he form of a m
atch probability. In all other areas of forensic science, it is long accept
ed practice for the scientist to give an opinion of the form "in my opinion
, x and y have the same source" but recent judgments have established that
this is not to be permitted when x and y are DNA profiles. Yet DNA profilin
g is better understood from a statistical standpoint than any other forensi
c techniques, including fingerprints and, as profiling techniques become mo
re powerful, so the match probabilities can be expected to become smaller.
This paper discusses issues relating to how such probabilities should be pr
esented at court.