Diagnosis and classification of lymphoma based on cytospin preparations: Acomparison of hematopathologists and cytopathologists

Citation
Jm. Fang et al., Diagnosis and classification of lymphoma based on cytospin preparations: Acomparison of hematopathologists and cytopathologists, DIAGN CYTOP, 22(6), 2000, pp. 336-341
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
87551039 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
336 - 341
Database
ISI
SICI code
8755-1039(200006)22:6<336:DACOLB>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The diagnosis of malignant lymphoma based on cytologic preparations is a so urce of much debate. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of a number of pathologists to diagnose and classify lymphoma using cytospin preparations, and to compare the rate of agreement between cytopathologists and hematopathologists. One hundred twenty-five cytospins prepared from hi stologically confirmed hematologic lesions were examined retrospectively an d independently by four hematopathologists/fellows and two cytopathologists without knowledge of the final diagnosis; the results were compared with t he final diagnoses derived from histology and immunophenotyping. Eighty-one cases were histologically diagnosed as lymphoma (including 67 cases of B-c ell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), and 44 cases represented a reactive process hi stologically. The distinction of a malignant from a benign process was made in 75% of the cases by cytospin examination, with cytopathologists correct ly diagnosing 75% and hematopathologists 76% of the cases. The accuracy rat e for subclassification of the lymphoma cases was 49% (46% for cytopatholog ists, 52% for hematopathologists). The cytopathologists correctly recognize d large-cell lymphoma at an increased frequency compared with the hematopat hologists (70% vs. 56%, P = 0.11), while the hematopathologists showed a gr eater ability to recognize and classify nonfollicle center low-grade B-cell lymphomas (57% vs. 28%, P = 0.01). We conclude that cytopathologists and h ematopathologists generally achieve similar accuracy rates in the morpholog ic evaluation of cytologic preparations of lymphoid lesions, though some di fferences in their performance do exist. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2000;22:336-341 . (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.