Heparin therapy may sometimes be seriously complicated by heparin-induced t
hrombocytopenia (HIT). Heparin use for treatment and prevention of thromboe
mbolism is more common in the elderly and that may be the reason why HIT is
reported more frequently in this group of patients. The first approach in
the management of HIT is awareness of this disorder. The morbidity and mort
ality associated with HIT may be reduced by avoiding unnecessary heparin ex
posure, by reducing the duration of heparinisation and by using low molecul
ar weight heparins rather than unfractionated heparin. A decrease from base
line values of at least 30% in the platelet count, any unexplained thrombot
ic event and the finding of a white clot at thrombectomy are clinical warni
ng signs that should alert physicians to a possible diagnosis of HIT. Indee
d, early clinical recognition of HIT may sometimes prevent the severe compl
ications associated with this disorder. Objective confirmation of the diagn
osis of HIT is difficult because none of the available biological tests pos
sess 100% sensitivity or 100% specificity. It is, however, possible to opti
mise the performances of the functional assay, mainly the platelet aggregat
ion test (PAT), by following the manoeuvres described by different investig
ators. The use of 2 classes of assay (functional and antigen assays) and re
peat testing on another day can avoid misdiagnosis of HIT. An alternative p
arenteral anticoagulant treatment is most often mandatory after heparin wit
hdrawal. Danaparoid sodium and lepirudin are 2 drugs that are currently ava
ilable for the treatment of HIT, and the efficacy of argatroban needs to be
confirmed in greater numbers of patients with HIT. The use of these drugs
has contributed to the reduction in the mortality and morbidity associated
with HIT.