1. The available data related to the activity energetics of lizards in
the field were collated with respect to three indices of activity ene
rgetics: the ecological cost of transport (ECT) expressed as a percent
age of the total energy, the proportion of total energy used in all fa
rms of activity (%AR), and the sustained metabolic scope (SusMS), defi
ned as the ratio of the total energy expenditure to the total resting
metabolism 2. The ECT values of lizards ranged from 3 to 36% with five
of 11 species having values >20%, The percentage AR ranged from 23 to
80% for lizards during active seasons. with most species having value
s > 50%. The SusMS ranged from 1.1 to 5.1. 3. Values of ECT are higher
for lizards than for mammals, in part because the costs of maintenanc
e metabolism are higher in mammals. 4. The percentage AR and SusMS val
ues of mammals are higher than those of lizards. 5. It follows from th
e previous two points that the proportion of the total daily energy th
at is expended in non-locomotory activities is disproportionately high
er in mammals compared with lizards. 6. The energy expended in locomot
ion is a significant portion of the energy budget of lizards, This is
generally true for all seasons in which then is activity.